转载自: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/f23I1kyJQoNPu6Ntrx0S6g

读后感:

Java1.6为Synchronized做了优化,增加了从偏向锁到轻量级锁再到重量级锁的过度,但是在最终转变为重量级锁之后,性能仍然较低. 这其中用到了CAS机制。

CAS优点

  • Synchronized属于悲观锁,悲观地认为程序中的并发情况严重,所以严防死守。CAS属于乐观锁,乐观地认为程序中的并发情况不那么严重,所以让线程不断去尝试更新。
  • 避免了context switch

CAS缺点

  • CPU消耗较大,不适合高并发场景(因为冲突太多,失败率高)。
  • ABA问题
  • 不能保证代码块的原子性。例如不能保证多个变量同时更新.

乐观锁转悲观锁的经典代码见:ConcurrentHashMap的size方法

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
public int size() {
// Try a few times to get accurate count. On failure due to
// continuous async changes in table, resort to locking.
final Segment<K,V>[] segments = this.segments;
int size;
boolean overflow; // true if size overflows 32 bits
long sum; // sum of modCounts
long last = 0L; // previous sum
int retries = -1; // first iteration isn't retry
try {
for (;;) {
if (retries++ == RETRIES_BEFORE_LOCK) {
for (int j = 0; j < segments.length; ++j)
ensureSegment(j).lock(); // force creation
}
sum = 0L;
size = 0;
overflow = false;
for (int j = 0; j < segments.length; ++j) {
Segment<K,V> seg = segmentAt(segments, j);
if (seg != null) {
sum += seg.modCount;
int c = seg.count;
if (c < 0 || (size += c) < 0)
overflow = true;
}
}
if (sum == last)
break;
last = sum;
}
} finally {
if (retries > RETRIES_BEFORE_LOCK) {
for (int j = 0; j < segments.length; ++j)
segmentAt(segments, j).unlock();
}
}
return overflow ? Integer.MAX_VALUE : size;
}